DOGSBITE.ORG website is not run by an “expert” in the field of canine behavior. It is run by a woman with a grudge. Her name is Colleen Lynn and she was the victim of a dog bite in 2007. Because of this incident that involved one individual dog she has decided to enact revenge on ALL pit bull type dogs.

Colleen Lynn blatantly lies on her website when she claims that pit bulls lead dog bite fatalities. She gathers all of her information from media reports, no questions asked. Clearly she doesn’t ask questions because most of what is reported in the media surrounding pit bulls and “attacks” is incorrect and has been repeatedly proven to be untrue.

Many question the truthfulness of Colleen’s account of what happened to her in June of 2007. Her story has changed multiple times. Pit Bulletin Legal News thoroughly investigated the incident and published these never before seen documents. It is clear to myself and many others “that Ms. Lynn never published the Seattle Animal Control records regarding the investigation because the story she is now telling bears very little resemblance to what actually happened, and are in total conflict with the only other witness involved: the dogwalker.”

While Colleen’s blatant disregard for the truth on her website is not a surprise and not unexpected, it is important for all of us to have the correct information easily available. Thankfully there is the National Canine Research Council whose dedicated staff comb through the details of every dog bite related fatality.

I encourage everyone to spend time carefully reading the invaluable information on NCR’s website including the 2010 Dog Bite Fatalities NCR and 2011 Preliminary Dog Bite Fatalities Report

The National Canine Research Council “re-interviews sources the media has reached, and located others they have not, among whom may be police investigators, animal control officers, coroners, veterinarians, health department officials, dog owners, and eye witnesses. They have obtained incident reports, bite reports, human and animal autopsy reports, summaries of judicial proceedings, and crime scene data and photographs when available.”

Access the National Canine Research Dog Bite Statistics HERE
NCRC’s informative section on ineffective laws including breed specific legislation HERE
FAQ’s regarding dog bites HERE and Breed Specific FAQ’s HERE

Dog bite-related fatalities are exceedingly rare. In 2010, 33 fatalities occurred within a population of more than 308 million and a canine population estimated at over 78 million. NCRC is currently investigating 31 incidents in a dog population of over 78 million that occurred during 2011 they may qualify as dog bite related fatalities. A final tally is subject to change as a result of NCRC’s thorough investigations. Their final report will be available the first week of 2013.

It is important to recognize that when attempting to research dog bites, researchers have frequently failed to acknowledge the relevance of stressful or inhumane situations that humans often force dogs to endure. At NCRC, they urge people to consider what the world looks like from their dog’s point of view.

“There are at least two parties involved in a dog bite; a dog and one or more humans. Dog behavior cannot be understood or analyzed apart from humans, or the situations in which humans have placed dogs.”

This is also where Mr Phillip Alexander gets his statistic from.

Courtesy of

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of This Is Bully to add comments!

Join This Is Bully


  • this is news to me i will have to do some research on miss colleen

  • HERE U GO MAME more info

  • these ppl are so sad they can talk all negative about the breed but when someone stand up against them their wrong gtfoh

  • Their all a bunch of knuckle heads on that dog bite site expose them

  • U guys got a site dedicated on talking bad about the breed u guys need to get your facts right
  • Lol u sound like the messenger Ms Collen is a pitbul hater don't bully my breed sweety
  • This reads more like a hit piece on the messanger rather than the message. Stick to facts and give a lucid, unbiased report. When I read this I didn't know whether you knew what you were talking about or if you held a grudge against Colleen. At times I wondered if it was your dog that had attacked her. You have a compelling case. Repeatedly calling someone a liar detracts from the message and calls your motives into question.just mention the site, that her stats have been called into question, give us sources and let the reader decide. No one wants to read a story in which someone is repeatedly accusing someone else of lying. State the facts, let us decide. If she's lying we're wise enough to figure that out. Your message will carry more weight if you demonstrate respect for others rather than contempt. This is not intended as an insult so please don't be insulted. I am not opposed to you story. It is simple constructive criticism and should be taken as such. I have 45 years experience and know what I'm talking about. I just want your message to be as effective as possible.
    • Ok miss Colleen
This reply was deleted.